Seems like little was achieved at Annapolis and that it could simply have been another of those many talk-shops. It's surprising that on both sides, we had some people protesting about the talks, meaning to say there seems to be nevr going to be a win win solution to both sides. Going to Annapolis without Hamas seems to me like trying to build a house without mortar (well that's how Great Zimbabwe was built, but it doesn't seems like the security intended was achieved ;-) ). It's good to have the Syrians there but what about the Iranians? After all Hezbullar seems to be the later's proxies!!
Do you think that is a hand the Iranians will easily give up, without there being something in it for them? Te two state solution seems to workable but what kind of state will Palestine be? I think it would be a hate filled, poor and deprived state that occasionally vents it's frustration on Israel. My other friend was saying he thinks Israel is not worthy that trouble after all, but well, that's just being simplistic about the whole issue.
What do you guys think is the best that can be done between these two peoples?