Post a reply to this user comment: Stroustrup misses the point Why was object-oriented programming called object-oriented in the first place? This article by Bjarne Stroustrup does not answer this question. In line with his conclusion OO should be called something like "inheritance based programming", not "object-oriented". One problem is that his bibliography is too young. It is impossible to understand OO without going back to the first articles about it in the 1950's. If the article represents current thinking, then there is no logical reason to continue using the not-understood phrase "object oriented". |
Sponsored links
Build IT Knowledge with Current & Trusted Content
Helps Employees Develop & Hone New Technical Programming Skills. Sign Up & Get Full Access.
Helps Employees Develop & Hone New Technical Programming Skills. Sign Up & Get Full Access.
Check Out IT Certification Preparation Materials
Sign Up With SkillSoft & Get Access to Training Materials for Over 50 Professional Certifications.
Sign Up With SkillSoft & Get Access to Training Materials for Over 50 Professional Certifications.
Villanova University Six Sigma & IT Certificate Programs
100% Online programs in Six Sigma, IS Security, CISSP Prep, Business Analysis, Proj. Mgmt. and more!
100% Online programs in Six Sigma, IS Security, CISSP Prep, Business Analysis, Proj. Mgmt. and more!
Virtual File System SDK
Create your own file systems in Windows and .NET applications
Create your own file systems in Windows and .NET applications
PureCM Software Configuration Management
Version control and integrated issue tracking - powerful and easy to use. Get your FREE trial now!
Version control and integrated issue tracking - powerful and easy to use. Get your FREE trial now!
