<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>RCGwoda's Feed - Programmer's Heaven</title>
    <link>http://www.programmersheaven.com/feed/User/508747/RSS.aspx</link>
    <description>Events at Programmer's Heaven related to the user RCGwoda.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2013 Programmers Heaven</copyright>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:55:01 -0700</pubDate>
    <generator>Argotic Syndication Framework 2007.3.0.1, http://www.codeplex.com/Argotic</generator>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <ttl>360</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>static function storage</title>
      <link />
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted a 'new message on the C and C++ forum.&lt;/p&gt;hi all,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1 question&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where is static function stored in memory..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
lets say memory is organised like th is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
------------&lt;br /&gt;
STACK&lt;br /&gt;
------------&lt;br /&gt;
HEAP&lt;br /&gt;
------------&lt;br /&gt;
.BSS (Uninitiazed varaibles)&lt;br /&gt;
------------&lt;br /&gt;
data section (initialized,global and static variables)&lt;br /&gt;
------------&lt;br /&gt;
text section (program code)&lt;br /&gt;
-----------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
R.C.Gwoda&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 05:15:14 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interrupt latency</title>
      <link />
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted a 'new message on the Embedded / RTOS forum.&lt;/p&gt;Hi all,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i have below questions ..can some please answer these questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is interrupt latency?&lt;br /&gt;
How you can optimize it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
Gwoda&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 05:12:11 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mailboxes vs Message queues</title>
      <link />
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted a 'reply on the Embedded / RTOS forum.&lt;/p&gt;Adding further,&lt;br /&gt;
  i wanted &lt;br /&gt;
 1. latency difference between Msg queue and Mailbox.&lt;br /&gt;
 2. Assuming 1 Multi-Core Processors having two cores A and B, which one should be used. &lt;br /&gt;
     a. between cores, which is best way to communicate.&lt;br /&gt;
     b. within core and between its threads, best way to communicate &lt;br /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:31:00 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mailboxes vs Message queues</title>
      <link />
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted a 'new message on the Embedded / RTOS forum.&lt;/p&gt;Hi all,&lt;br /&gt;
I wanted to check, which is the best option to make two different threads interact. Lets say i have 2 task A_task and B_task. A is at highest priority to B_task. Lets say i have to send few data parameters from A to B.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there are 2 approaches&lt;br /&gt;
1. send message to queue and maintain message queue.&lt;br /&gt;
2. Have data in global memory, post only mail box and the receiving thread needs to pick up pointer from mail box and retrieve data from shared global memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
under what constraints, conditions, do we need to approach&lt;br /&gt;
1. Message queues&lt;br /&gt;
2. Mailboxes &lt;br /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:13:07 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>