Why Java is not 100% pure object oriented language?
plz give me brief answer

: Why Java is not 100% pure object oriented language?
: plz give me brief answer
:

It wasn't practical at the time.

---------------------------------
HOWTO ask questions: http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

: Why Java is not 100% pure object oriented language?
: plz give me brief answer
:

not practical but,

java lets you make things (varables, objects) public (freely available) in a dangerous way if you want to (when certain data is made public you cannot rely on it) . You have to code OO for java to be Object Oriented (OO)

Even if you stay 100% OO then by using the java API sometimes you implicitly end-up not being 100% OO.

Just technical phsyco-babble. Blood won't start spilling if everything isn't OO 100%.


Sean Anderson
Data Virtue

: : Why Java is not 100% pure object oriented language?
: : plz give me brief answer
: :
:
: not practical but,
:
: java lets you make things (varables, objects) public (freely available) in a dangerous way if you want to (when certain data is made public you cannot rely on it) . You have to code OO for java to be Object Oriented (OO)
:
: Even if you stay 100% OO then by using the java API sometimes you implicitly end-up not being 100% OO.
:
: Just technical phsyco-babble. Blood won't start spilling if everything isn't OO 100%.
:
:
: Sean Anderson
: Data Virtue
:

I thought it was truly OO... Or do you have to program in an OO way in order for it to be OO? Ooo this is a headache :)

: I thought it was truly OO... Or do you have to program in an OO way in order for it to be OO? Ooo this is a headache :)
:

In Java there is a distinction between primitives (int, short, etc) and Objects (java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Short, etc).

---------------------------------
HOWTO ask questions: http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html