: : : : : : :
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_813754.html
: : : : : : :
: : : : : : : Is this just? I think it is. However in the UK it would just carry a prison term. In fact it would just be a secure hospital.
: : : : : : :
: : : : : :
: : : : : :
: : : : : : For half of what he did,he deserved it.
: : : : : :
: : : : : : This thing about a killer being "conscious' of his action has been and will be misused as long as it lasts.
: : : : : :
: : : : : : I think someone who kills and doesn't deserve a death sentence is someone who kills in self defence.But then suddenly ,every killing will
: : : : : : become self defence in many forms ? Sometimes justice is so stupid.
: : : : : :
: : : : :
: : : : : Now compare to this other story
: : : : :
: : : : :
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_813518.html
: : : : :
: : : :
: : : : I repeat
Sometimes justice is so stupid .Maybe the defenition of justice is.
: : : :
: : :
Guys, you are trying to compare two absolutely different things. Japan - normal civilized justice based on common human rules, Nigeria - justice based on religion rules .
: : :
: : :
: :
: : Yes, that is the point too,Justice means different things to different people.But the thread started with the question about the death sentence.To me,the first one is just and second one is not.
: :
:
Same here
:
Agreed. The point I was trying to say is. How can you have a legal system that has a religious bias? How can a system be moulded around something that can not be scientifically proved?
Arrrrrhhgggggggg. I hope this does not start a Religious thread. I want to talk about law.
There is a by law in York, England ( Where I live ) Which states that I can legally kill a Scotsman with a cross bow on any Sunday.
Obviously I will still be punished for first degree murder though.